Selecting the right endoscopic camera module can be daunting, especially when faced with a sea of specifications and conflicting priorities. Many users struggle to differentiate between models or attempt to integrate all sensors at once, leading to confusion. After extensive research and direct communication with manufacturers, we’ve decoded the key factors for endoscopic module selection. Let’s break it down systematically.
Key Models & Market Trends
The table below summarizes popular OmniVision (OV) endoscopic camera modules, categorized by resolution, sensor size, and critical parameters:
| Module | Resolution & Frame Rate | Sensor Size | Pixel Size | Image Area | Field of View (FOV) |
| OVM6948 | 200×200@30fps | 1/36″ | 1.75µmx1.75µm | 364µm×364µm | Customized |
| OVM6946 | 400×400@30fps | 1/18″ | 1.75µmx1.75µm | 714μm x 707 µm | Customized |
| OCHTA10 | 400×400@30fps | 1/31″ | 1.008µmx1.008µm | 411.264 µm x 411.264 µm | Customized |
| OCHFA10 | 720×720@30fps | 1/17.5″ | 1.008µmx1.008µm | 733.824µm x 733.824µm | Customized |
| OV9734 | 1280×720@30fps | 1/9″ | 1.4µmx1.4µm | 1819.58 µm x 1033.34 µm | Customized |
| OV2740 | 1920×1080@60fps | 1/6″ | 1.4µmx1.4µm | 2728.8µm x 1549.8µm | Customized |
| OH02A10 | 1920×1080@60fps | 1/6″ | 1.4µmx1.4µm | 2728.8µm x 1549.8 µm | Customized |
| OCHSA10 | 800×800@60fps | 1/14.25″ | 1.116µmx1.116µm | – | Customized |
| OCH2B10 | 1500×1500@60fps | 1/7.5″ | 1.116µmx1.116µm | 1691.856µm x 1691.856 µm | Customized |
Market Insights
- Dominant Models:
- OVM6946 (400×400@30) and OV9734 (720p@30) are the most widely adopted due to their balance of performance, cost, and compatibility.
- OCHTA10 (upgraded OVM6948) and OCHFA10 (OVM6946 upgrade) are emerging but face adoption challenges due to pricing and legacy preferences.
- Key Observations:
- OVM6946 vs. OCHFA10: Despite being an older model, OVM6946 remains popular due to lower costs and earlier market penetration.
- OH02A10 vs. OV2740: OH02A10 is a medical-grade variant of OV2740 but is less favored due to its premium pricing.
- Future Contenders: OCHSA10 and OCH2B10 are niche but worth monitoring for high-resolution applications.
Critical Parameters for Selection
- Sensor Size
- The sensor’s physical dimensions directly impact the endoscope’s outer diameter and insertion flexibility. Smaller sensors (e.g., 1/36″) enable ultra-thin designs for delicate procedures, while larger sensors (e.g., 1/6″) suit applications with fewer size constraints.
- Resolution & Pixel Size
- Resolution: Higher resolutions (e.g., 1080p@60) deliver sharper images but require larger sensors.
- Pixel Size: Smaller pixels (e.g., 1.008μm) enable higher resolution in compact sensors but may reduce low-light performance.
- Trade-off Alert: A 1mm-sized sensor cannot achieve 1080p resolution. Prioritize size or clarity based on your application.
- FOV & Frame Rate
- Most modules offer a 120° FOV, ideal for broad anatomical coverage.
- High frame rates (e.g., 60 fps) are critical for real-time imaging in dynamic environments.
Recommendations by Use Case
- Size-Constrained Applications
- Ultra-Thin Designs: OCHTA10 (1/31″) or legacy OVM6948 (1/36″).
- Balanced Performance: OVM6946 (1/18″, 400×400@30).
- High-Resolution Needs
- Ultra-Thin Designs: OCHTA10 (1/31″) or legacy OVM6948 (1/36″).
- Balanced Performance: OVM6946 (1/18″, 400×400@30).
- Future-Proofing
- Emerging Models: OCHSA10 (800×800@60) and OCH2B10 (1500×1500@60) for specialized high-res needs.
Conclusion: Tailored Recommendations for Your Needs
Choosing the right endoscopic camera module hinges on aligning technical specifications with your clinical or industrial application. Below is a streamlined guide to help you prioritize:
- For Ultra-Minimally Invasive Procedures (Size-Critical)
- Key Priority: Smallest possible diameter for accessing narrow anatomical pathways.
- Top Picks:
- OCHTA10 (1/31″ sensor, 0.65×0.65mm image area): Ideal for delicate applications requiring a balance of compactness and 400×400 resolution.
- Legacy Option: OVM6948 (1/36″, 0.65×0.65mm) – Use only if cost constraints outweigh newer alternatives.
- For High-Resolution Imaging (Clarity Over Size)
- For High-Resolution Imaging (Clarity Over Size)
- Key Priority: Crisp visualization for detailed diagnostics or surgical precision.
- Top Picks:
- OV2740 (1/6″ sensor, 1080p@60): Best for larger endoscopes where size is less restrictive.
- Medical-Grade Alternative: OH02A10 – Identical to OV2740 but certified for medical use (premium pricing).
- For Balanced Performance (Cost + Versatility)
- Key Priority: Optimal trade-off between size, resolution, and affordability.
- Top Picks:
- OVM6946 (1/18″, 400×400@30): Market favorite for general-purpose endoscopy with proven reliability.
- OV9734 (1/9″, 720p@30): Upgraded clarity for mid-sized applications.
- For Future-Proofing & Specialized Use Cases
- Key Priority: High-resolution, high-frame-rate needs (e.g., dynamic imaging or research).
- Top Picks:
- OCH2B10 (1500×1500@60, 1/7.5″): Emerging leader for ultra-HD requirements.
- OCHSA10 (800×800@60, 1/14.25″): Compact yet high-speed for niche applications.
By matching your priorities to these recommendations, you can streamline your selection process and avoid costly oversights. Stay tuned for our deep dive into endoscopic modules – the next frontier in medical imaging!
Views: 3